I have often found the industry standard of reviews which simply unpack (an exhibition) as routinely dull as this, so it is definitely is good writing by the standards of what gets published. And as always currently, it is a bit overlong, wordy. Judgment on when to end a sentence, a paragraph, a piece, requires some meta-processes not (yet) available. Its boringly accurate because of a lack of judgment, even if completely wrong.
PS thanks for ruining a favourite work of mine, there are not many left.
One of the more artificial aspects of dialogues like the one in this post is, as you point out, a lack of variation in length of the bot's responses. Thanks for your comments.
I have often found the industry standard of reviews which simply unpack (an exhibition) as routinely dull as this, so it is definitely is good writing by the standards of what gets published. And as always currently, it is a bit overlong, wordy. Judgment on when to end a sentence, a paragraph, a piece, requires some meta-processes not (yet) available. Its boringly accurate because of a lack of judgment, even if completely wrong.
PS thanks for ruining a favourite work of mine, there are not many left.
One of the more artificial aspects of dialogues like the one in this post is, as you point out, a lack of variation in length of the bot's responses. Thanks for your comments.